The West talks about peace in Ukraine “in exchange for territory”
Photo: GLOBAL LOOK PRESS
There is such a well-known agency in the United States of America – Bloomberg. This agency has long acquired the image of a kind of information cesspool for the White House, the State Department and the Pentagon. I would also put it another way: this agency often acts as a quarrelsome informant in the American “court” or as a cunning disinformer. At the request of its owners, it releases cleverly packaged nonsense to discredit America’s opponents, or launches test balloons into the global information space (to detect the reaction of politicians and the military to a particular problem).
Why am I suddenly writing about this now?
There is a reason. This time, the Bloomberg agency made an interesting statement. Its meaning: judging by official sociological research carried out in Ukraine, the number of Ukrainians who agree to cede part of their territories to Russia in exchange for peace is increasing.
This idea is not new. It has been heard more than once from the mouths of American politicians and generals and other NATO countries.
It sounds like a formula: peace in exchange for territory.
So in this case, it is possible that the Bloomberg agency, which hangs around the doors of Biden, Blinken and Austin, has learned something. That is why he published this information, hiding behind sociological data from Ukraine. But if the problem of exchanging Ukrainian territories for peace is really being discussed, then the question arises: what territories exactly is Kiev (on the advice of the United States) willing to cede to Russia in exchange for peace?
Let’s speculate a little. I would talk, for example, about 7 territories: these are the Kharkov, Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporozhye, Kherson, Odessa and Nikolaev regions. Normal, right? But these are just my assumptions. Let’s say that Moscow sets exactly this condition: we are ready to negotiate with kyiv if it agrees to abandon these territories. Or, at least, from regions and republics that, by law, according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, are Russian territories. These are the DPR, LPR and Zaporozhye of the Kherson region.
But there is another very important question. Will kyiv give up territory and can the rest of Ukraine continue to be the same Bandera terrorist? Where will American, Polish and other countries’ military bases and even, possibly, nuclear weapons appear?
Who will give us guarantees that this will not happen?
Although, however, such conditions seem to be provided for in the Ukrainian demilitarization plan.
Is kyiv willing to discuss these issues “under the American skirt”? Even according to the “peace in exchange for territories” formula, which Bloomberg cleverly let slip?
Is Moscow ready to discuss this, at what level and under what conditions?
We’ll see. The answers, apparently, should appear very soon.
READ ALSO
Russia’s military power has surpassed that of the United States: the Pentagon sounds the alarm and recognizes our army as the strongest in the world.
For the first time since the collapse of the USSR, Western experts recognized the Russian army as the most powerful in the world. The United States and China only occupy second or third place (details)
THE NAIS IS OFFICIAL EDITOR ON NAIS NEWS